User talk:80.111.17.229

Welcome!
Hi 80.111.17.229! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Thomas Meng (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Parasitism (social offense)
You appear to be involved in an Edit War, and are barred by WP:3RR. Persist and you will be blocked from editing. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 15:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

The bride is beautiful, but she is married to another man
Hello, you violated the 1RR at The bride is beautiful, but she is married to another man. Could you please self-revert and bring up your concerns on the talk page? --Freeebiirdd (talk) 13:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Please note that this edit was your second revert of an article covered by an arbitration ruling barring more than one revert in any 24-hour period. I request that you revert your edit, and that you take more care to follow these restrictions, to prevent the need to refer you to the enforcement noticeboard. --Freeebiirdd (talk) 13:56, 5 April 2021 (UTC)


 * It seems as though you have yourself violated 1RR. One revert at 21:52 April 4th and another at 22:20 on the same date. 80.111.17.229 (talk) 14:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

You could've brought this up at the time, in which case you'd have been informed that 1RR doesn't apply to reverting IP edits such as yours. As for now, you have still neglected to undo your revert. This a third request that you do so. --Freeebiirdd (talk) 23:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You need to stop edit warring.80.111.17.229 (talk) 12:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

You have chosen to ignore all three requests. Please note:

ARBPIA General Sanctions

5) The following set of sanctions will be considered the "ARBPIA General Sanctions".

A. Discretionary sanctions: Standard discretionary sanctions are activated for the area of conflict. Any uninvolved administrator may apply sanctions as an arbitration enforcement action to users editing the area of conflict whilst aware.

B. 500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict.

As a result of this ruling, all IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I will revert your edits. Please refrain from further edits to this page or to others related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. --Freeebiirdd (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * This page has nothing to do with war. 80.111.17.229 (talk) 12:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The restrictions are not just about the war(s), but about 'any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict'. A phrase directly related to the various points of view on the origin of the conflict is easily within that scope - the 2nd sentence in this article is " the phrase generally conveys an ignored warning that a Jewish homeland could not be reestablished in the Land of Israel/Palestine without interfering with the indigenous Arab majority". Kenosha Forever (talk) 20:00, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm CyanoTex. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Stop Asian Hate—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CyanoTex (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Balbriggan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 16:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Ping
-- Tamzin [cetacean needed] (she/they) 19:34, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Phenolla. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ken Loach—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — Phenolla   ∞  12:19, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maud Gonne, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that.   Limited Idea4me (talk) 16:38, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Iain Banks, you may be blocked from editing.   Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Iain Banks, you may be blocked from editing. Please also see and take heed of Edit warring -- Cactus.man  &#9997;  09:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at Skibbereen (song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Banner talk 23:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)