User talk:80.133.45.105

Sock puppetry
Sock puppetry is forbidden here. Each IP counts as a separate account. You're editing from more than one IP, so create one account and only use it.


 * Per WP:BRD you must not restore the content, but must discuss the matter on the talk pages. -- Brangifer (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Non-MEDRS content removed
Stop trying to add content that violates WP:MEDRS.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vitamin C, you may be blocked from editing. -- Brangifer (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vitamin C megadosage, you may be blocked from editing. -- Brangifer (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Vitamin C. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Brangifer (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Vitamin C megadosage. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Brangifer (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC)‎
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.