User talk:80.189.130.141

Pseudoarchaeology
Although "alternative" is often used by proponents, Wikipedia must reflect the point of view of reliable sources on the topic (i.e. the view from mainstream archaeology). Some relevant policies are reliable sources, policy about pseudoscience and policy for fringe topics. Happy editing, — Paleo Neonate  – 12:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Your recent editing history at Fingerprints of the Gods shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Please also see WP:BRD: once our edits are contested, we should first seek consensus for them at the article's talk page before reinstating them. Thanks, — Paleo Neonate  – 15:50, 9 June 2019 (UTC)