User talk:80.189.87.239

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (80.189.87.239) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Greaves' Rules has been reverted. Your edit here to Greaves' Rules was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://skidmoresisland.blogspot.com/2010_05_16_archive.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please...
..read the links in the "Welcome" section of this page. I understand you want to contribute to Wikipedia, and I hope you find a place here, but you really need to work on your civility. You are managing to piss off the very people that would be willing to help you get up to speed at Wikipedia. There is a manual of style and many guidelines that we all follow. We are the ones who SET the guidelines and policies here, it is all by consensus. You can too, but you start by learning the guidelines instead of ignoring them, and working with others instead of attacking them. Otherwise, you will burn out from all the confrontation, and most of your edits will end up being reverting, wasting your time and everyone else's. This is friendly advice, and if you want to be happy and a valuable contributor here, I would suggest you take it as that, friendly advice, and learn a bit about the community and policies here very soon. Dennis Brown (talk) 22:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Dear Mr Dennis Brown,

If you read your last message you will see that your are very patronising. I am civil, I do not suspend users, try to kill their articles as some low lives do. No I don't mean you and I don't suggest you do. My edits do not in the end end up "being reverted" because they are accurate good and helpful and what the spirit of the 'Pedia is. I have even been accused of being a troll. If you look at my work both signed and unsigned you will find I have made literally thousands of edits through the years.

Most are uncontroversial. Some aren't like Crieff Hydr, Greaves' Rules or back gardens. They have been attacked by "editors", and we are all "editors", who jump up and sown and say "no, no, tis is not what the 'Pedia is about" and then want to fight kindergarten wars and about who hit whom first. I almost never mention anyone by name, and if you analyse what I have written forensically, you will find I have not attacked you here.

But you represent an insufferable attitude towards the 'Pedia, up with which I cannot put.

Charles Norrie