User talk:80.202.240.160

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Vestigiality. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vestigiality&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 13:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vestigiality. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vestigiality was changed by 80.202.240.160 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93825 on 2012-06-02T13:55:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vestigiality, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vestigiality, you may be blocked from editing.

Well thanks for finally telling us what you were on about so that we can see that you may have acted in good faith! However, please note that the text you most recently removed does mention the importance of the vestigial structures in mating and in defecation as well. Also, you have deleted a lot more text besides, which had nothing to do with whales. I am going to reinstate the text, and I invite you please to come to the talk page and discuss what you want to change and why. It seldom is either polite or constructive to revert material without explanation or replacement. Reading the material you deleted, I should have thought it obvious that vestigiality does not simply mean non-functionality. A structure can be vestigial in one sense and functional in another, which is what we have here. All the best and let's hear from you. JonRichfield (talk) 18:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)