User talk:80.237.79.140

April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Geniac (talk) 19:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

You mean like uncited bullshit? When will you stop publishing nonsense? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.237.79.140 (talk • contribs) 05:37, April 30, 2008

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. --Geniac (talk) 18:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

You are such a moron, 75% of Wikipedia is unsourced, why is it that everytime I edit anything it is removed, yet the other 75% unsourced bs stays? Because you have an agenda and in your little mundane life this is the only way you can have any shread of power over others. Enjoy your avatar, because in real life you are a loser. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.237.79.140 (talk • contribs) 05:28, May 3, 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Geniac (talk) 13:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. --Geniac (talk) 13:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

OMG Controversy, heaven forbid, you ought to call tis Swiss-epedia! If you want neutrality instead of truth, move to fucking Switzerland you moron, because nothing on Wikipedia is cited, you are a little man with no power and no sense of truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.237.79.140 (talk • contribs) 23:18, May 5, 2008

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. --Geniac (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 20:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Let's see: how can i phrase this: I DONT CARE! YOU ARE TYRANNICAL PUBLISHERS OF FALSE INFORMATION!

Really, get a life, you are not that important! Block me, edit me, call me a vandal, I DONT CARE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.237.79.140 (talk • contribs) 22:50, May 7, 2008

BY THE WAY, LET ME SHOW WHAT A HYPOCRITE YOU REALLY ARE: 1. GO TO THE PAGE ON FREEMASONRY AND YOU WILL SEE THE SAME INFORMATION POSTED BY ANOTHER USER, 2. HOW IS THAT FOR VERIFIABILITY 3. IF YOU ARE NOT A HYPOCRITE YOU WILL RECOGNIZE THAT THE MATERIAL IS ON SEVERAL PAGES IN WIKIPEDIA AND THEREFORE IS VERIFIABLE, SO 4. PUT UP OR SHUT UP GENIAC. THIS WILL PROVE YOUR TRUE AGENDA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.237.79.140 (talk • contribs) 22:54, May 7, 2008


 * Ok, I've copied those sources over. The final sentence, "The implication that Freemasonry is responsible for Substance D, i.e. despair" is still unsourced, though. --Geniac (talk) 03:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, so why dont you start by deleting everything on Wikipedia that is not sourced? This should decrease the information on your website by about 60%. Let me connect the dots for you ... Freemasonry = forget-me-nots, forget-me-nots are used in a Scanner Darkly as the source of substance d, pkd said that substance d stands for despair, therefore substance d is freemasonry! Why are you guys so fanatical with some users and completely tolerant with others who randomly place 60% of bullshit on your site, easy answer = agenda. There is not one thing I have added in about 1000 posts that remains on wikipedia even in areas where i am an expert; 14 year old kids are editing me! amazing!