User talk:80.250.2.182

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (80.250.2.182) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page University of New York in Prague has been reverted. Your edit here to University of New York in Prague was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/UNYP.edu) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2022
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Riverside School, Prague, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 10:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm WJ94. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bag End without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WJ94 (talk) 15:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bag End. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''Hi, you can't remove reliably-cited content because you don't like it, this is a global and uncensored encyclopedia and we report the facts as we find them. Thanks.'' Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The content I removed is unconstructive itself. It contributes nothing but personal bias and belief onto a topic with no actual factual contribution, simply fringe speculation. The "Strangeness" of Hobbiton, the Shire, and Bag End can be added onto with plenty of factual or in-lore content. The removed content does not constitute this in any way whatsoever.
 * Simply citing content does not make it a reliable addition to the overall topic.
 * There is plenty of information on wikipedia people "do not like" but only that which has no basis to the topic is removed. Random speculation on this topic does not constitute "facts as you see them". 80.250.2.182 (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for discussing, but on the description of the content, you are definitively not correct. "Unconstructive": no, the material is a properly constructed part of the encyclopedia, consisting of neutrally-written text and a properly-formatted citation to a reliable source, all three things together as dictated in Wikipedia's core policies. "Nothing but personal bias and belief": no, it is a reliable published source, relating directly to the subject matter of the article. "Simply fringe speculation": no, LBGTQ+ constitutes some 15% of the world's population, and scholars who study from that aspect may themselves be straight, who knows, so it is an accepted mainstream position in a democratic society; further, the cited materials themselves are part of a larger discourse of Tolkien studies, where such views are open to comment, revision, and scholarly criticism. I'm afraid that your position and attitude are sharply contrary to Wikipedia's own policies, which are tolerant and uncensored as far as content is concerned, but as insistent on accuracy and citation as scholars are in their fields of research. If you don't agree with policy you can make proposals for it to be changed (good luck with that), but you can't simply freelance-delete and hope to get away with it. I do hope this is clear. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:27, 9 November 2022 (UTC)