User talk:80.31.154.191

July 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Human zoo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. The information you removed had references - claiming it's false isn't an adequate justification for removal. If the information could not be verified with the sources given, or there is another clear reason for removal of content, please explain it clearly in your edit summary/on the talk page. Thanks. Iliad17 (talk) 16:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Dampier. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iliad17 (talk) 16:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to William Dampier. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:37, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)