User talk:80.42.112.5

Your persistent attempt to use Wikipedia for promotion has led to a ban on John Galea, or any misspellings, being added to Wikipedia articles. Before this started, he had a brief mention in a couple of articles, but you have shot yourself in the foot. We're an encyclopaedia - not everyone makes the grade for notability. Please respect that. If you disagree, you can submit an article via WP:AFC, as due to your persistent vandalism (and repeatedly pushing your own agenda, using misspellings to trick people etc. is vandalism), there is a ban on pages being created on him. Please stop this, and promote him at an appropriate venue. This will never get through, but will put off editors who are just trying to build an encyclopaedia, giving up their free time. God knows how many more articles Wikipedia could have if I didn't have to keep spending my time on this. Boleyn (talk) 07:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Boleyn Your constant unjustified changes and and attitude towards the subject of John Galea is verging legally on discrimination which if not corrected could result in legal action against the publication and the individuals who are accountable for this action. The fact that John Galea is a notable figure is plain to see to anyone who reads the articles and features he has been featured in, and supplied as references plenty of times. He has worked with a host of names on Wikipedia, he is about to play a Main Stage of Major UK Festival and has performed live at many events and has had had Chart success.

If John Galea is not notable enough to feature on Wikipedia, why do the following artists, who do not the same notoriety have pages. You cannot say you can't compare artists-as you clearly can. Wikipedia is meant be a fair encyclopaedia that reports sources and references that have justification time and time again for a John Galea page.

here are a limited sample.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anttix https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Scheme_(band) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan-Pierre_Tomlin

John Galea is more notable and has more Press and Features than these and these are just a few names. John Galea as a page should be reinstated as soon as possible as it isn't Promotion for John Galea it is merely documenting historical editorial evidence of his notable career.

Response to legal threats
You are welcome, and I have repeatedly asked you too under the many pseudonyms you have used, to submit an article via WP:AFC. However, you cannot edit war the article's way on - it has been assessed several times by experienced editors, including at WP:AFD. Re-creating it under a million different names doesn't change that. As you have made legal threats, I will need to report that. Boleyn (talk) 18:50, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 19:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Once again aggressive unnecessary action is taken. Not one threat was made. Discrimination against this subject is clear to see by Boleyn.

I have edited the above comment, left by the IP but signed with my name! Boleyn (talk) 16:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , the IP has posted here an objection to the block. Boleyn (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Alex ShihTalk 19:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)