User talk:80.77.163.200

(a) Marx was intimately involved in 1948 revolutions. All data is readily available in the main Wikipedia entry ("Karl Marx")

(b) However my attempt to add a very brief paragraph on this (was involved; published the Communist Manifesto to coincide with the start of 1848 revolutions; was kicked out of a number of European countries in 1848-1849 as a result of his subversion and support of 1848 actions - moved to Britain in August 1849) -- was immediately and aggressively censored by some Wikipedia dwarf.

(c) Note that he was aggressively (and moronically) UN-rational - instead of changing wording he banned the whole paragraph; he offensively claimed that 'citations' were needed - but in the same breath claimed that 'other Wikipedia articles could not be the source' and to spit once more he put forward that Big Boogie of Wikipedia - 'no original research'

(d) That the dwarf offends intelligence and hypocritically hides behind his demands, oh so thinly disguised as 'requirements for the encyclopedia article' a total lack of knowledge - OR some political agenda - was immediately obvious. Again, one glance at 'Karl Marx' and 'the Communist Manifesto' in W. confirms my paragraph introduces 0 (zero) new factology

HOWEVER the arrogance and violation of logic by the dwarf raises a new question: FOR SOME REASON NO READER IS ALLOWED TO ASSOCIATE MARX WITH 1848 MOVEMENT, this is a given (by whom? for what exactly reason?) and to achieve this any rape of logic, any hypocrisy, any lie or preposterous demand are allowed

- WHAT IS THE POLITICAL AGENDA BEHIND THIS? WHY IS A DWARF ALLOWED TO OFFEND INTELLIGENCE? WHY A NOBODY HAS POWERS TO DENY REALITY?

November 2021
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  18:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Forty-Eighters. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike  &#124;  Talk  19:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sauerkraut, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 20:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

RESPONSE: RE - SAUERKRAUT: all added data is IN THE BODY of the article, my addition simply stresses that sour cabbage is NOT, emphatically NOT a German-only foodstuff. Its use in Russia is ubiquitous, as one example. Your pretext for vandalizing my edit is as fake as they come - NO NEW INFORMATION WAS GIVEN, it is all in the article body, all I did was clarify the first, header/abstract section.

You are vandalizing my edits under false, hypocritical pretexts. Stop the vandalism.