User talk:80.79.208.20

Thank you for experimenting with the page Pavlova (food) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Grutness...wha?  12:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Princess Beatrice of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Ocaasi (talk) 11:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Born again (Christianity), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Joren (talk) 21:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Ok, boilerplate aside, sorry I didn't send you a message the first time; I should have. You're right, the article is full of original research and in fact the surrounding stuff probably should be removed. Feel free to remove other uncited information if it seems off for you; the burden of proof is always on the person adding unsourced information, not on the person removing :) The article has been on my list of once-overs to do, but I have been waiting on a library visit to find some good sources.

You should feel free to challenge and ask for citation any claim that is unsupported, and similarly other editors are free to do the same with your claims. The problem with anecdotes/original research is that they often accurately reflect the editors' personal experience, but that personal experience is not available to the rest of the world and therefore claims based on personal experience should not be added to an article. For example, in my experience, the term born again is not generally used to imply a charismatic experience, and I am curious what tradition you come from where that is common. Yes, I am actually curious, and I'd appreciate you sharing if you feel so inclined, learning about others' experiences is something I enjoy. But anyway, please feel free to challenge and remove claims that do not have a source; we need to bring this article up to encyclopedic standards.

-- Joren (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Disembowelment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A520 &#124;   Talk me away! / sign it! 11:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It's Malpass93! (drop me a ___) 13:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Dykeenies has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.   Wikipelli Talk   14:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Frankie Boyle. Thank you. January ( talk ) 14:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on London Underground. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at London Underground, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - This has been discussed, and you are blatantly edit-warring. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:39, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring and conflicts of interest
Hi,

I notice that you are edit warring with other editors on London Underground. Please stop. Edit warring is detrimental to the encyclopedia, please seek consensus on the talk page before inserting the content again, failure to do so might lead to a block.

You also seem to be closely associated with the subject at hand. Conflicts of interests are often incompatible with our mission to build a neutral encyclopedia, and is strongly discouraged. You should read our Conflict of Interest guidelines before editing.

Regards, -- Luk  talk 14:21, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at London Underground. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Luk  talk 15:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.