User talk:80.98.204.142

March 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mikhail Tolstykh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 08:30, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not write bullshit ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.98.204.142 (talk • contribs)


 * You're gonna have to be more specific than that. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 16:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, right. They actually caught a hard core nazi (Oleg Mikats) who belonged to the Right Sector higher command. Right Sector and this commander specifically participated in the terrorising of Donbass. This is kinda uncontested and well documented. Givi and a few soldiers give this guy a light beating and a few kicks in the butt but he has already been released, without the characteristic mutilations and/or beating marks people get when caught by US allies (Right Sector and various Islamic currents etc.). Furthermore Oleg wasn't "droned" although his guilt is much better established than the guilt of a victim of a "signature strike". I don't want to mention his possible spiriting away to Guantanamo, etc. All in all, he got what he deserved and he got it very lightly. So in light of this information, the hair spliting on the page looks, hm, BS.

May 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mikhail Tolstykh, you may be blocked from editing. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 19:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Mikhail Tolstykh. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Trim02 (talk) 19:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello, I don't think this was disruptive. Actually, my "comments" were much more factual than the original (and irrelevant, out of context) hair splitting about the Geneva Convetions. I named the prisoners' affiliation (Right Sector) and the commander (O. Mikats). Furthermore I mentioned the fact that they had been already released. So whether my comment is an "opinion" or not, it was more factual than the original. SO this is why I would like to stick to my version. If you want to really contribute to this section, consider rewording it so that it wouldn't be so "opinion".
 * Whether or not what you're saying is correct or not, the block of content you keep removing from that page is sourced properly and verifiable, whereas what you're adding is not. Editors are removing your edits on this pretense; if you wish to discuss it further, use the talk page on the article prior to making dramatic changes such as this. Lucas &#34;nicatronTg&#34; Nicodemus (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Sourcing and verifiability, how noble :) Ok, if you wish :)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mikhail Tolstykh. deleting sourced text and inserting content like "a light beating and a few kicks into their bottoms is the minimum they deserved" is obvious vandalism. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 20:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as done at Mikhail Tolstykh. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Abecedare (talk) 21:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.