User talk:81.0.163.51

March 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turing completeness, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 21:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I have provided sufficient evidence. You didn't like the source, that's not my problem. I added a citation needed as a compromise. If you don't like that, that's not my problem anymore. 81.0.163.51 (talk) 21:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * and for that matter, why on earth did you remove magic the gathering earlier? There's also sufficient evidence of that being Turing complete. Nah mate, your god complex ends here. To war. 81.0.163.51 (talk) 21:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 22:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * You are also blocked for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, and for your combative attitude. Cullen328 (talk) 22:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)