User talk:81.101.84.185

September 2016
Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Talk:Galileo Galilei— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 08:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Air Force. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blackpool, you may be blocked from editing. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blackpool. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Royal Air Force has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Royal Air Force was changed by 81.101.84.185 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961644 on 2017-02-20T15:59:24+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Brookie :) { - like the mist - there  one moment and then gone!}  (Whisper...) 16:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Salicylic acid, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Salicylic acid was changed by 81.101.84.185 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851673 on 2017-02-22T09:50:13+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Käthe Kollwitz— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:78.252.128.66


A tag has been placed on User talk:78.252.128.66, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)