User talk:81.103.64.23

July 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Tristan und Isolde. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. FULBERT (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tristan und Isolde. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &#124; Zippybonzo &#124;  Talk &#124;  13:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)


 * How is it vandalism to challenge the unsupported statement that Tristan and Isolde is widely regarded as the pinnacle of the operatic repertoire. Surely the author has to justify such a bold statement. So much for free speech. 81.103.64.23 (talk) 13:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Your edit didn't challenge anything, it added text that wasn't constructive. &#124; Zippybonzo &#124;  Talk &#124;  13:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Surely the original author should support their assertion? I have simply challenged their assertion. Clearly you are a Wagnerian who writes from emotion rather than evidence. If Tristan is widely regarded as the pinnacle of the operatic repertoire, the author must have evidence to support that? Rather it is a subjective opinion. 81.103.64.23 (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC)