User talk:81.105.178.180

April 2021
Hello, I'm Padgriffin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Malcolm Macdonald—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 13:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Paul Kirkham, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Invalid OS talk  11:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Hammersoft (talk) 13:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Paul Kirkham have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Paul Kirkham was changed by 81.105.178.180 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907956 on 2022-02-07T11:58:39+00:00

March 2022
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Arthur Shawcross—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn talk  11:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Romiley, you may be blocked from editing. SunDawn talk  11:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 11:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Marple, Greater Manchester—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  11:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wonka (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wonka (film). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 13:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wonka (film), you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 13:32, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wonka (film). Serols (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * please no ban me!!!!!!! 81.105.178.180 (talk) 13:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Pingo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 12:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jenny Odell—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jenny Odell. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Blue Edits. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Whaley Bridge, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blue Edits (talk) 12:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Whaley Bridge. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Whaley Bridge was changed by 81.105.178.180 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950756 on 2022-12-07T13:15:52+00:00

March 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Paul Kirkham—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:26, 3 March 2023 (UTC)