User talk:81.111.91.82

Hello, 81.111.91.82. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add requestedit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added. Scholartop (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, Scholartop. Sounds understandable although not as you said. Recently we came to know this page and found it could be more complete if the less well-known aspect were also included, but should only do so with rigor to be sustained by references following consulting experts. Can you not just remove these references if they were an issue? 81.111.91.82 (talk) 20:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear 81.111.91.82, Please mention your request on talk page. Please start a new thread on the article talk page and add to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added. Scholartop (talk) 04:08, 15 September 2022 (UTC)