User talk:81.131.103.252

National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Alternate history, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I suggest that you consult a reputable dictionary, after having worked to obtain a sound education, to find out the difference between the meaning of 'alternate' and 'alternative'. That a word is colloquially misused in the US, which is common and is a reflection on the generally poor state of education for many US-ians, does not provide credible justification for defining such misuse as so-called 'American English', neither do occasional recorded mispronunciations by people who either should or, if better educated, would know better.


 * One of the most amusing attempted redefinitions based on ignorance was the Wikipedia article on 'nucular' (an atom does not have a 'nuculus', but a nucleus). The article appeared following G W Bush's repeated mispronunciation, was mocked, was taken away, and later reappeared, once again trying to define US-ian ignorance as an acceptable alternative to sound education.


 * A recent, comparable, source of international amusement was Trump's use of the phrase 'fake news' and one of his acolytes' similar use of 'alternative facts'. Neither recognised just how ridiculous they sounded.  My preference is for such articles to keep appearing because they provide such good amusement and entertainment for the globally better educated.  The US is still a young country that still behaves like a delinquent teenager on the world stage and, like a hormonal teenager, thinks that by making a loud noise it demonstrates that it is better and wiser than everyone else.  It isn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.131.103.252 (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medicating Normal (documentary) (March 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Medicating Normal (documentary) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:81.131.103.252 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:81.131.103.252 reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Medicating Normal (documentary)


A tag has been placed on Draft:Medicating Normal (documentary), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Pavlov2 (talk) 09:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

New message from 331dot
331dot (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Medicating Normal (documentary)
Hello, 81.131.103.252. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Medicating Normal (documentary), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)