User talk:81.134.166.71

December 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lithium-ion battery, you may be blocked from editing. Roxy the dog 10:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * With all due respect, 'vandalism' as described by Wikipedia is by definition: 'Deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia.'
 * I have in no way 'vandalized' Wikipedia.
 * UltraMax batteries is one of the largest manufacturers of lithium ion batteries and I have simply made that information available to users just like other information is present and available to users here. This information is true by all means and is not obstructing or defeating the dissemination of knowledge via this free encyclopedia.
 * I hope this clarifies any doubt you may have and I hope you understand the intent is not disruptive but it is to be helpful and collaborative. 81.134.166.71 (talk) 10:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I have no doubt that you are promoting your business, against wikipedia policy and guideline. see WP:PROMO and WP:COI and do not restore your edits. - Roxy the dog 10:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Please note,
 * Firstly, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Who_writes_Wikipedia%3F - this is a page on 'Who writes Wikipedia'. Please check that Wikipedia allows Marketers to contribute to Wikipedia.
 * Secondly, please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PROMO - this is the link you mentioned. Please read carefully where it is mentioned 'Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery.'
 * Please note that I have not used any form of puffery but only stated the mere existence and use of the battery. No 'advantages', no 'promotions' nothing. Just plain objective information.
 * Once again, I hope we can be civil and collaborative in this space. 81.134.166.71 (talk) 11:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Please note: 'Anti-vandalism tools, such as Twinkle, Huggle, and rollback, should not be used to undo changes that are constructive and made in good faith' (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Twinkle)
 * I hope we can share this space in a respectful, collaborative way. 81.134.166.71 (talk) 11:39, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lithium-ion battery. Roxy the dog 11:39, 9 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello once again.
 * Please show me exactly how I have 'vandalized' this page in your opinion.
 * 1. 'Vandalism' as described by Wikipedia is by definition: 'Deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia.'
 * 2. I am a Marketer and have the right to contribute to Wikipedia. See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Who_writes_Wikipedia%3F
 * 3. Marketers are allowed to provide factual, unbiased information,free of puffery. See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Who_writes_Wikipedia%3F
 * 4. Please point out exactly what part of my contributions are an act of vandalism or contain any form of puffery, in your opinion.
 * 4. Lastly, if you are so offended or threatened by me mentioning another manufacturer of batteries, please also take down all other brand names mentioned.
 * I do hope you stop misusing your power and give people a fair chance to avail of good knowledge. 81.134.166.71 (talk) 11:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * See my reply here, and note that I have no power. -Roxy the dog 11:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * What is the issue this time?
 * I took off the link and just mentioned the brand name just like others are mentioned. 81.134.166.71 (talk) 09:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello 81.134.166.71. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:81.134.166.71. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 12:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Due to your promotional editing, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Lithium-ion battery. Paid editors must have an account and make the mandatory Paid contributions disclosure. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 18:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)