User talk:81.135.201.231

January 2024
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bad Dragon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 10:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @Waxworker, Sorry for not citing my edit, but I don't know how to cite something like this because I don't know of any articles stating this fact, I just discovered it myself from using the websites. However, anyone can just open e621.net, search anything so that you get an advertisement (you can even search "rating:s" to only view SFW posts), and refresh the page until you get an advertisement for bad dragon (it should not take long, they advertise pretty heavily on there). Click on it and you will go to the bad dragon website, where you will then see the biography and illustration. Other than just referencing the entirety of e621, I don't see how this could be correctly cited, but I don't believe this information should be ignored because of this.
 * If the reason you reverted the change was due to the statement that e621 is owned by bad dragons CEO, this information being on wikipedia on the page for E621, but it is a disambiguation page, and e621.net does not have its own page. Should this be cited? JorgenTibbits (talk) 17:47, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * - A reliable source mentioning this would be required for verification - WP:BURDEN states that "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution". Citing e621 itself isn't suitable. I also think that a part of the site appearing differently if you click an advertisement is trivial, and unnecessary to note unless reliable sources have discussed it. Waxworker (talk) 18:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)