User talk:81.154.24.81

About CFR vs IFR in List of human disease case fatality rates
I think the main problem here is that this article is about CFR, while you are arguing for posting the IFR—which accounts for all asymptomatic and undiagnosed infections, which from the studies I've read is indeed closer to 0.5% (I've seen 0.12-0.2%, 0.7%, 0.9%).
 * Hiya, thank you for your interesting answer. First please could you add your signature? Thank you! Wrt CFR vs IFR, don't you think the CFR number is ridiculous specially during an outbreak and with many different countries testing on many different scales (in relation to the size of country population). For example, to extrapolate, in some countries where testing would only be carried out on dead people the CFR would be 100%, in some other countries where testing would be done on the whole population CFR would be 0.5%. So that CFR number imho is completely irrelevant and misleading. What do you think? If you have the time could you convince the guys "in charge" of the article to use IFR and not CFR as CFR is really silly and makes Wikipedia looks very silly (wouldn't be the 1st time though!). Thank you! 81.154.24.81 (talk) 02:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

3RR
Thank you for attempting to resolve the dispute, however as now the WP:3RR policy has been broken, if the dispute isn't resolved, you may want to open a thread at the appropriate noticeboard. See WP:EW for more info. Thanks again for your constructive edits. Please feel free to ping me or leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Ed6767 (talk) 23:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)