User talk:81.170.111.69

July 2021
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Jairo Arboleda article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 17:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please cite your sources when you add historical caps and goals --BlameRuiner (talk) 17:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dirceu—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:50, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mario Kempes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:50, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Garrincha, you may be blocked from editing. --BlameRuiner (talk) 06:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --BlameRuiner (talk) 19:07, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ladislao Mazurkiewicz. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.   — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 18:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently, disruptively ignoring community concerns about neutrality voiced here on this page. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Linda Buthelezi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 19:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the John Moeti article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 19:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tueba, you may be blocked from editing. --BlameRuiner (talk) 07:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Régis Manon.  GiantSnowman 17:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GiantSnowman 17:35, 29 August 2021 (UTC)