User talk:81.174.146.199

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PatGallacher (talk) 19:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Loudoun Hill does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! PatGallacher (talk) 22:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that in this edit to Loudoun Hill, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 08:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Loudoun Hill, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 08:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loudoun Hill. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Loudoun Hill was changed by 81.174.146.199 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953485 on 2021-06-12T08:21:12+00:00

April 2023
Hello, I'm Nath1991. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Mikoyan MiG-29 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Nath1991 (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)