User talk:81.200.176.13

Hello, User 81.200.176.13.

We seem to be reverting each other's edits to the page on Mrs. Lily Safra. My own position is that, if the article enters (as it does) into relatively detailed discussion of the "Empress Bianca" book history, including emphasizing the agreement reached with the UK publisher to withdraw the book from publication, then it is equally relevant and legitimate to add the fact that a revised version of the book did in fact appear in the US. You have now on several occasions deleted various different formulations of this statement.

On the assumption that your motivation is not simply to delete any and all relevant factual material that might conceivably be considered inconvenient to the subject of the article, I would like to propose to you in a constructive spirit that I would be open to considering possible alternative phrasings of the point about the US publication that you might wish to propose. I would, however, oppose anything resembling censorship of a Wikipedia article.

Best wishes to you for a happy 2010. Nandt1 (talk) 14:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

March 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lily Safra, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. If you feel there is a legitimate issue with that portion of the article, please take it to the talk page of the article before continuing the cycle of reversion. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lily Safra. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Lily Safra. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 12:33, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Lily Safra, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 09:57, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Lily Safra, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 09:57, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Caro Emerald has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/user/CaroEmeraldOfficiel. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:27, 18 May 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.