User talk:81.241.224.173

September 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tom O'Carroll, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello 81.241.224.173! Your additions to National Enquirer have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yee no  (talk) 🍁 17:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Robert Baer has been reverted. Your edit here to Robert Baer was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_xc4O2CbbI) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:35, 16 July 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2022
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to The View (talk show) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to The View (talk show) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI4YNiV_B4E&t=372s) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to The View (talk show). An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. KyleJoan talk 09:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia advice is noted, though many other links to YouTube and 'The View' on Wikipedia remain, please explain? 81.241.224.173 (talk) 07:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to The View (talk show). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Your edit here to The View (talk show) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI4YNiV_B4E&t=372s) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.


 * Thank you for your further Wikipedia advice. Please can you explain what kind of 'Critical Reponse' is appropriate to critique 'The View'? If not a 'Critical Response' by a well known YouTube channel carefully explaining their critical evidence. Thank you. 81.241.224.173 (talk) 08:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at September 11 attacks advance-knowledge conspiracy theories, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 09:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

The Good Soldier (disambiguation)
Please note that disambiguation pages like The Good Soldier (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:


 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
 * Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 13:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

The Good Soldier (disambiguation) again
Please do not continue to add external links to The Good Soldier (disambiguation). As explained above, disambiguation pages lead readers to Wikipedia articles, not to the greater World Wide Web. I could not find any article that mentions the film or Silvina Lindmann. If you would like to write an article on the film, please read Your First Article. Leschnei (talk) 12:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry, a mispelling of 'Landsmann':
 * https://www.google.com/search?q=Silvina+Landsmann+%22The+Good+Soldier%22&rlz=1C1GOVB_nlBE995BE995&sxsrf=ALiCzsYRGpZR6sbD40FBGrJzmH5DXP9ICA%3A1664551580297&ei=nAo3Y4vfEcTQadjxmcAM&ved=0ahUKEwiLnZ3t6bz6AhVEaBoKHdh4BsgQ4dUDCA4&uact=5&oq=Silvina+Landsmann+%22The+Good+Soldier%22&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBAgAEB46CggjEK4CELADECc6BggAEB4QDUoECEEYAUoECEYYAFDMCFi4JGCJMGgBcAB4AIAB4gGIAYoIkgEFMC41LjKYAQCgAQHIAQHAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz 81.241.224.173 (talk) 15:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Fahrenheit 9/11, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Nagol0929 (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2022
Your edit to Deep state has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 15:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at September 11 attacks advance-knowledge conspiracy theories, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Blocked
To edit, please log in. [ Last edited]: Last edited by: (UTC) Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)