User talk:81.31.122.234

January 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to James VI and I have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: James VI and I was changed by 81.31.122.234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911331 on 2022-01-14T14:34:10+00:00

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tsar Bomba have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:59, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tsar Bomba was changed by 81.31.122.234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962947 on 2022-02-02T14:59:10+00:00

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Big Mama Thornton—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ray Charles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Grant McCann, you may be blocked from editing. Egghead06 (talk) 13:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robbie Savage. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 11:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jérémie Aliadière, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 13:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Liz Truss, you may be blocked from editing. Sahaib (talk) 12:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to SQL injection—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SQL injection. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: SQL injection was changed by 81.31.122.234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869287 on 2023-02-21T11:54:57+00:00

October 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Yaxley, Cambridgeshire—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)