User talk:81.40.41.84

July 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. You are wrong, looking at drawings or other images is not 'Original research', anybody who is not blind, and has a brain with working memory can do this. Please look at images of RQ-170 Sentinel and Horten Ho-IX/ Gotha Go-229, you'll see it are almost identical, dimensions do not differ a lot, just the RQ-170 has one jet engine, while the German Flying Wing had two, btw, the Horten Ho-IX unit in Smithsonian Institution had no 'Svastika' painted on rear side when it left Germany, somebody painted it while in the USA. R U fighting some type of propaganda war? Please hear: 'Propaganda, a blatant attempt to influence your musical taste', LP including some songs by 'The Police', reported as CIA music. CIA is not very intelligent, they allowed the Rosenbergs, an hebrew surname, accessing the A Bomb secrets, they passed it to Soviets, Stalin had an ambassador named also 'Rosenberg'. I feel your proposal or decision has no rationale. Revert any change you made, consider a resign. Blessings +