User talk:81.79.149.13

March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yuga Cycle. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

In the edit summary of this revert, you wrote "If Sri Yuktewar's contribution is valid then Sathya Sai Baba's contribution must also be valid. You should not allow your personal prejudice to cloud your judgement."

Firstly, claiming I have a personal prejudice or am showing bias, especially without any proof, is unacceptable behavior. You should assume good faith and avoid personal attacks.

Secondly, you repeatedly add the "Sathya Sai Baba" section consisting entirely of original research. Please desist from re-adding it until you properly support the section with reliable secondary sources. Quoting exclusively primary sources of your own choosing does not constitute WP:RS.

"Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves."

Thirdly, in response to your wanting to add this section because another section exists. The "Sri Yukteswar Giri", "René Guénon", and "Alain Daniélou" sections are supported by reliable secondary sources, whereas the "Sathya Sai Baba" section is not as I stated above. Jroberson108 (talk) 16:18, 5 March 2023 (UTC)