User talk:82.10.246.54

September 2020
Hello, I'm Becky Sayles. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Darcy Blake—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.   B E C K Y S A Y L E S   01:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Skwawkbox. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. jp×g 05:34, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Poo (Cabrales). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 23:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Alanis Morissette, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 01:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

What. Eva.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bloodgate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.   1TWO3Writer (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sociology, you may be blocked from editing. Dirkbb (talk) 20:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Justiyaya. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Skeletor, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Just ' i ' yaya  15:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Coventry. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Name Omitted (talk) 04:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —It'sCtrlwiki • talk • 00:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Pacific Ocean. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Reda ctyll  Talk page  21:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1994 Labour Party leadership election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Absolute Radio—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Andethyst  (talk)  01:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jane McDonald. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 20:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

August 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Trent Alexander-Arnold, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 19:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Talk:Poo (Cabrales)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 23:21, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Poo (Cabrales). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Poo (Cabrales) was changed by 82.10.246.54 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947454 on 2022-10-17T23:22:02+00:00

Anthony Fleet
mirror.co.uk is not a wp:reliable source. WP:DAILYMIRROR Adakiko (talk) 23:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm JCMLuis. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Absolute Radio—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  luis .  💬 00:28, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 00:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.