User talk:82.10.86.69

May 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at London Underground 2009 Stock, you may be blocked from editing. Thryduulf (talk) 12:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. Thryduulf (talk) 11:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Summer time in Europe does not have an edit summary.&#32;You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting.

If you consider it appropriate to revert another editor's changes, it is essential that you provide an explanation for doing so. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * If you continue to believe that your reversion was justified, please contribute to the discussion at Talk:Summer time in Europe. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Govia Thameslink Railway, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Maurice Oly. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 315, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Maurice Oly (talk) 21:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)