User talk:82.11.214.196

September 2023
Hello, I'm Siroxo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, McKamey Manor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &mdash;siro&chi;o 09:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to McKamey Manor. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. &mdash;siro&chi;o 09:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at McKamey Manor, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;siro&chi;o 09:23, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

But when people do cite sources it still gets removed so what's the point? I'll just wait til I'm banned, have a nice day on your power trip. x I'm also not sure you understand what controversy means.
 * I really do suggest reading through WP:Verifiability to get a better understanding of why sources are required. Consider reading WP:Neutral point of view as well as it's one reason why such information might be removed even with a source. &mdash;siro&chi;o 09:34, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Also, this edit on my talk page really isn't okay. We try to treat one another with civility here. &mdash;siro&chi;o 09:36, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I honestly don't care mate. Everything I said was stated as 'apparently' and was in the controversies section, I stand by it 100%. You are on a power trip. 82.11.214.196 (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)