User talk:82.113.227.110

Nomination of Ryan Wang for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Wang, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Ryan Wang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to David Goode (organist)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Kornilov affair have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 09:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:34, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Swiss Federal Constitution—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Megan B....  It’s all coming to me till the end of time  10:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ampere. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 13:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ampere, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 13:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

March 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Jenk Oz. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you.  Heart  (talk) 21:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Clan Macdonald of Clanranald. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:58, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Operation Barbarossa. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:38, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lambrook without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fragrant Peony (talk) 18:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lambrook, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 18:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of one year for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)