User talk:82.114.89.102

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a WP:POINT. If you have a complaint about Lee Harvey Oswald, express your concerns on that talk page rather than introducing unencyclopedic POV to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Also, repeatedly trying to insert a description of them as "Jewish spies" is inappropriate. HouseOfChange (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Winnie the Pooh (Disney character), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021
Hello, I'm Arccosecant. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Balkans theatre seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —  csc -1 20:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Balkans theatre. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 20:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)