User talk:82.132.216.74

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thameslink and Great Northern has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:41, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thameslink and Great Northern was changed by 82.132.216.74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951829 on 2016-11-18T22:40:56+00:00.

January 2017
Review (again - see block log) of breadth/duration of current rangeblock would be much appreciated. Covers 02's entire UK broadband network? 82.132.216.74 (talk) 14:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You need to talk to the blocking admin, Graham87. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Will do. Thanks! 82.132.216.74 (talk) 14:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Review of breadth/duration of current rangeblock would be much appreciated. Covers 02's entire UK broadband network? 82.132.216.74 (talk) 14:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, I didn't realise it was that large ... but the IP's I'm dealing with range from 82.132.216.74 to 82.132.216.74, so that's the smallest range which could be effective. The range has a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=User%3A82.132.192.0%2F18&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_thanks_log=1&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_tag_log=1&hide_review_log=1 rather lengthy block log], Mike V, you've blocked this range twice for a month in the recent past – could you comment here? This block doesn't stop you from editing with an account – if you need one, there are ways to get one of your own. I feel that we're here to create an encyclopedia, not to play whac-A-Mole with vandals, so I'm not inclined to reduce the range/duration of the block without a very good reason. Graham 87 16:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Also see the history of Folklore (Nelly Furtado album) for an idea of the kind of editor we're dealing with. Graham 87 16:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the swift reply. Given the breadth, maybe you could consider a substantial reduction in duration and then reinstate if necessary? I appreciate it is important to deal as efficiently as possible with these problems, but I do wonder if a block of this scale doesn't cause at least as much disruption as the edits that instigated it, if not more. 82.132.216.74 (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your nte. On further reconsideration, I've gone and reduced it to two months. Graham 87 04:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

November 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bevis Mugabi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)