User talk:82.132.219.104

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (82.132.219.104) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Haploidavey (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Hyderabad State edits
Just saw your edit summary. It's a difficult business; I don't personally disagree with "annexation" as a description of what happened, but the matter is seems immensely controversial; providing a balanced viewpoint that represents all significant views on this matter is not, I believe, feasible in the lead as it stands. Any attempt to do so would, imo, bloat the lead with too much information, and self-justifications from competing sources with opposing points of view. I think it would be quite legitimate, and informative, to address the deficit (or error, as you see it) in the main body of the article, as long as that's done with due regard to wikipedia policies on an overall neutral point of view. If something's truly, notably controversial, it will be dealt with as notable in mainstream sources, and we can merely outline the controversy as described by those sources. We don't take sides. Haploidavey (talk) 13:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm TheGoldenPatrik1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Pat rik  17:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to GSC Enterprises, Inc.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Die Hard (film series), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)