User talk:82.132.226.244

January 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Canthusus (talk) 18:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013
Hello, I'm Yintan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Louie Spence, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,   Yinta n   09:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm Darkwind. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Voortrekker High School because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 21:17, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Voortrekker High School with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghostin (December 4)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Ghostin was accepted
 Ghostin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

March 2014
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Leigh Academy, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   Wikipelli Talk   20:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hat-trick Design


Hello 82.132.226.244. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Hat-trick Design".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fortrose because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Sarr Cat. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Farnham Heath End School because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. probably a school ip Sarr Cat ∑;3 14:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saxon Shore with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. 7Sidz (talk) 14:09, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Millwall F.C.. PureRED (talk) 19:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2015
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Paul Barlow may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Laun chba  ller  21:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Lord Williams's School ‎, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Unblock request
New IP now obtained. I trust this action will be taken in good faith. Thank you. 82.132.215.119 (talk) 15:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

And another. I frequently report IPs to AIV, so am an active supporter of blocks where appropriate, but futile blocks such as this are pointless and counterproductive. 82.132.212.175 (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

And another. 82.132.217.196 (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

And another. 82.132.226.202 (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

October 2023
Ad Orientem, please listen I've been blocked for no reason. I was accused for the anonblock, please get me unlocked so I can do good faith edits again. 82.132.226.244 (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ghostin (disambiguation)


The page Ghostin (disambiguation) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion review. – robertsky (talk) 11:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)