User talk:82.132.244.98

Cantor's diagonal argument edit
Your wrong, he wasn't reckless he really was confused. He should have quite however when he fired the infinite size proof techniques in place of ≤ and ≥ to preserve the law of trichotomy (any a is only one of < = > any b). However set theory axiomisation such as zfc was reckless, but not by him. Victor Kosko 21:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)