User talk:82.132.246.51

June 2020
Hello, I'm ProcrasinatingReader. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wigan Rovers F.C.—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 20:12, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022
Hello, I'm SierraTangoCharlie1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Emily Lloyd, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STC1  talk  17:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Please don't add 'Inside knowledge' to Wikipedia
I refer to your recent edit summaries at Emily Lloyd. Please read Verifiability. Readers of Wikipedia need to be able to verify information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Accordingly, please do not add unsourced information, based on 'Inside knowledge' or anything else. It doesn't matter if it is true or not, we don't want the information as it is not verifiable. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 23:37, 15 March 2022 (UTC)