User talk:82.14.222.21

March 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Historical race concepts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rsk6400 (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


 * "Anatomically" stems from "anatomy". According to your own article "anatomy" is the parameter by which humans are classified. A Neanderthal was therefore not "modern" by virtue of her/his own anatomy.
 * Your article claims that in the past ("Historical race concepts") race was used as a parameter to "superficially divide" "anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens"). Yet, human anatomy is something material, tangible, measurable, empiric, factual, scientific and therefore anything but superficial. Indeed, the division of humans in the past was anything but superficial, as it was attempted to be based on something as complex and precise as human anatomy. What was incorrect, was the assumption that a certain kind of human anatomy directly correlated with political, philosophical and therefore abstract concepts.
 * I am not sure whether English is your first language, or what your profession is, but as a British lawyer I think I am well placed to suggest that perhaps what you meant by "The concept of race as a superficial division of anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) has an extensive history in Europe and the Americas." is that in current times dividing modern humans into political-cultural groups according to their human anatomy not longer accurately reflect their race. 82.14.222.21 (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)