User talk:82.14.98.39

June 2022
Hello, I'm DanielRigal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to David Lammy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DanielRigal (talk) 20:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jude Bellingham, you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 18:27, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Pack it in!
Oh wow! I just checked your contribution history and I see that you have been changing "English" to "British" for non-white English people on and off for almost a year. If I had noticed that before I gave you the warning above I would have chosen a much higher level warning. I'm not going to change it now but if there is any more of this racist nonsense then you should not be surprised if things to escalate to a block very fast. The English are the people of England, whatever their various ethnicities. You must not use racist phrases like "not ethnically English" in edit summaries.

Also, you must not use misleading phrases in edit summaries like "Changed ethinicity to be more accurate" when what you changed was not related to ethnicity and made the article less accurate. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:23, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You are wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_people . The mentioned people are all British citizens and they are not of English ethnicity. If you can show they have an English parent then you can call them English, if they have not English ancestry they are not English. Your position is highly racist. 82.14.98.39 (talk) 17:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * That is a very specific, non-standard, use of the word "English". It is not what people normally mean by "English". There is no possible justification for pretending that non-white English people are not English. You can't brush off credible accusations of racist editing with "No. You're the actual racist". Several different people have all reverted your nonsense and it is time to drop the stick. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * "That is a very specific, non-standard, use of the word "English". It is not what people normally mean by "English". It's the correct denfinition of an English person. I haven't mentioned skin colour once. Every change I made is because of the people not being of English ethinicity, in some cases I mentioned the person ethnic in the edit and still refered to their British nationality. Example, David Lammy is Guyanse heritage and he is a citizen of Britain, he has no English ancestry. This isn't a debate, I'm giving you the correct use of the term. There is nothing "racist" about what I have edited and there is nothing credible about accusations. You should rethink your objectives on this website because distorting the truth and facts is not ok. 82.14.98.39 (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You have been editing articles about non-white English people to remove the description of them as English. That is completely unacceptable. You have been warned sufficiently. You understand the issue but refuse to acknowledge it. I don't propose to argue further as it is clearly pointless. So long as you don't make any more edits of that type then you can believe whatever nonsense you like. You can also make whatever constructive edits you like but if you vandalise any Wikipedia article in a similar manner again then you can look forward to being blocked from editing. My advice is that you should try to think of something else that you can do on Wikipedia which might actually be helpful to the project. Presumably you have other interests besides this? DanielRigal (talk) 21:17, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I've been editing articles to ACCURATELY reflect the person's ethnicity and nationaility. That is accepatable. English is an ethnicity, it desribes the group of people that formed the English a thousand years ago and only decendants of these people can be English. Skin colour has nothing to do with it. If someone is mixed race and has one English parent then they are English, so again nothing to do with skin colour. You can't say the same thing for people with ZERO English ancestry. Calling them British is the only accepatable term and describes their nationailty, then you can add their parental origins. This isn't a belief like your opinions, my statements are fact. 82.14.98.39 (talk) 06:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)