User talk:82.159.136.211

I've never seen Rbit. Can you give an example? — Omegatron 14:13, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

You can see it in: and a lot more. Regards.
 * http://www.autoid.org/SC31/2004/dec/SG3_200411_430_Gen2Update.pdf
 * http://nesl.ee.ucla.edu/courses/ee206a/2003s/submissions/hw3/LUAN_NGUYEN/p2.doc

Spam in LliureX
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on LliureX, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because LliureX is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting LliureX, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Template:Wikimedia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Wikimedia. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Wikimedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Public entity


The article Public entity has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable US-specific dictionary definition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  12:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Continental union for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Continental union is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Continental union until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qzekrom 💬 theythem 16:17, 30 March 2019 (UTC)