User talk:82.20.240.157

Removal of quote from judges.
You wrote upon removal: "let's not fall for the trap of implying that there might be merit to this, when all reality-based commentators agree that if the standing issue were rectified it would also fail on the merits". The actual judicial comment is significant and does not imply anything but clearly identifies jurisdiction and standing as the pivot. Viktorikona (talk) 19:01, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Reverted your edit
I reverted you vandalized edit at Roger Mortimer of Wigmore, if you think it should not be reverted then tell me why? (also read:WP:SPS) ~ Limited Idea4me (talk) 16:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Unblock

 * Why? There are no warnings here. 82.20.240.157 (talk) 22:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I see no block on this IP address. That's all I can say unless you tell the exact message that appears when you attempt to edit. 331dot (talk) 22:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * well that's weird - the message said this was a web host rangeblock.
 * There has been successful edits from this IP today(not necessarily by you). 331dot (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * thanks. I don't know what was going on, maybe my VPN was active.

Zeitgeist
Sources, reviews etc refr to it as a documentary, so so do we. A crappy, puerile, tasteless, unfunny comedy is still a comedy. The word describes a genre, not a quality.Pincrete (talk) 10:38, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * sources actually describe it as a crock of shit. The inability of Wikipedia editors to forego the categorization of absolutely everything, regardless how inappropriate, is an issue not observed in most sources: the term "documentary" very often does not appear at all in coverage.

February 2022
Hello, I'm TheXug. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Girl from Ipanema seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Considering all criticism is a key element to Wikipedia information based on criticism TheXug (talk) 22:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * , you’re kidding, right? This was absolutely nothing to do with NPOV. The content I removed is a listicle of no objective significance. In the lead. Those things are a dime a dozen.