User talk:82.22.41.195

Tom Weir edits on 2006-10-25
Hi. Thanks for working on our encyclopedia. Your edits to Tom Weir have been reverted because they were inappropriate for the article "space". If you want to comment on an article, each article has what is known as a "talk page" attached - you can get to it by clicking on the discussion tab at the top of page for the article you want to comment on. But you don't need to discuss all changes or list out what you want to see changed and wait for others to do it. We encourage people to edit the article for themselves - so instead of saying "this change needs to be made", you can just go in and change it. You only need to discuss the change if another editor disagrees with you (which they will probably note by changing the article back).

This may sound complicated, but since most changes are straight forward it ends up being quite easy - you are welcome to just go ahead and edit articles to make them better, just slow down and discuss if others disagree with you.

So having said all that(!), on the Tom Weir article you pointed out spelling issues, but there is disagreement about whether it should be Kilmarnock Parish Church. Since you brought up the original request to change the spelling I was hoping you could shed some light on the discussion. Such as what made you think it was in Kilmarnock rather than Kilmaronock (did you go to the service, or read about it in the paper etc. Is there anything you can point to that shows the original newsreports had the wrong church?). Please add your say at the Tom Weir talk page in the Kilmaronock/Kilmarnock section. Thanks -Siobhan Hansa 13:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)