User talk:82.231.248.230

Greetings. As a contributor to Wikipedia, and a person with a strong scientific education, I strongly protest the continuing slander of Parapsychology as a "pseudoscience". If the article had said that some scientists regard it as one, or perhaps even that most regard it that way (in which case you'd have to offer proof) that would be information. But this is simply biased opinion, masquerading as information. And it's not only biased, it's dogmatic and dictatorial. As the persons involved know full well, many people have protested this slander, with no result. It simply continues, with no acknowledgement of the minority, but very eminent, and influential SCIENTIFIC opinion to the contrary. Therefore, I'm also writing this to ask you how one can mount a campaign or petition of protest to the editorial board of Wikipedia, when a perceived dictatorial bias persists, in cavalier indifference to protest. In other words, when the usual channels of feedback are not working. Because of the continuing masquerade of this "pseudoscience" opinion as fact, I see no other way. Thanks for your attention and information, Joseph Rowe