User talk:82.24.177.138

September 2020
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.---Darius (talk) 17:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Martina Anderson have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Martina Anderson was changed by 82.24.177.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860937 on 2021-05-04T19:34:10+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Martina Anderson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HelenDegenerate (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Claudy bombing, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;talk 09:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 2601:246:CF80:3990:412F:EE11:BE12:7F9D. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 2601:246:CF80:3990:412F:EE11:BE12:7F9D (talk) 12:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tullyvallen massacre. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Hello, I'm FDW777. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Tullyvallen massacre‎ in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FDW777 (talk) 12:32, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tullyvallen massacre, you may be blocked from editing.  Angry Harpy   talk 12:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Holy Cross dispute.   Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Thomas Begley, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:26, 23 October 2023 (UTC)