User talk:82.35.27.41

November 2019
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- / Alex /21  01:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ST47 (talk) 01:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You didn't discuss. You made personal attacks about other editor's logic. Yes, personal attacks. It's not up to you to decide if what you said is a personal attack, it's up to the editors that you addressed the comments to, and they deemed it a personal attack. You edit-warred over the content, with no less than five editors, instead of rewording it into a more civil manner as you were requested to several times. This unblock request will certainly not be met with the response you're looking for, as it addresses none of your behaviour that got you blocked, and instead lays the blame entirely upon everyone else. If you've been given suggestions by more experienced editors, it's up to you to take that into account. I'm more than happy to discuss the issue with you - once and only once you reply in a more civil manner. -- / Alex /21  02:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Alex. This is the same person.  Apologies for any confusion, but obviously since my ban has been unjustly upheld I can't respond from the same place, and finding an alternative took a little time.


 * Thank you for your response, but unfortunately for you, I deem that response a personal attack against me. Obviously, you don't get a say in this matter.  By your own standards, I, as the editor to whom your comments were addressed, get to decide whether they constitute a personal attack or not.  And I say they do.


 * end sarcasm*


 * Do you see now why your stance here is a little bit...unsustainable.


 * A comment does not become a 'personal attack' just because an irrational editor subjectively feels that it is. The matter is determined by objective reality.  So here's my challenge to you.  Quote one single thing I've said that constitutes a personal attack.  You won't be able to, but I challenge you to try.  Same challenge to you 331dot, since you made the same false claim without evidence.  Provide one single quote of me 'personally attacking' someone.


 * You won't be able to.


 * Because all I've done is point about the application of faulty, inconsistent logic. Nothing more.5.83.99.44 (talk) 02:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

See above, another WP:SOCK account editing the talk page in the same manner again. Cheers. -- / Alex /21  03:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Tagging 331dot as well. Cheers. -- / Alex /21  03:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)