User talk:82.36.101.79

March 2021
Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cindy Jackson—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello CommanderWaterford. So do I understand correctly that an obvious spoof website advertising itself as "a fantasy" is allowed by Wikipedia to be used not only as a reference, but the false information therein is allowed to be published in the biography of a living person? The referenced site in question clearly declares: "This website is an invention, all that is contained in this article – is a fantasy of the author, and has nothing to do with reality. Any coincidence of names – a pure accident."82.36.101.79 (talk) 10:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)