User talk:82.42.20.92

September 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at British Rail Class 08.   David Biddulph (talk) 07:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to British Rail Class 08—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 17:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to British Rail Class 08. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Isabelle 🔔 17:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate images, as you did at Ford Transit, you may be blocked from editing. Pamzeis (talk) 07:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at W. B. Yeats. Denisarona (talk) 13:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 22:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism, as done at UB40. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham Beards (talk) 10:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CrossCountry, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 19:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CrossCountry. Notfrompedro (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at CrossCountry. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)