User talk:82.45.42.138

April 2018
Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Change (Christina Aguilera song). Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''' Binksternet (talk) 04:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

How exactly did I vandalize it? I posted the source, and I'll post it here if you don't believe me: http://www.officialcharts.com/charts/scottish-singles-chart/20160624/41/ And I certainly haven't been using multiple IP addresses, I don't understand this at all, I haven't purposely vandalized any pages

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Change (Christina Aguilera song). Change (Christina Aguilera song) is not in http://www.officialcharts.com/charts/scottish-singles-chart/ Ron h jones (Talk) 22:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

No, I can guarantee you it is! Chart dated June 30, 2016 http://www.officialcharts.com/charts/scottish-singles-chart/20160624/41/

Re: Olivia de Havilland
In reply to your undo, there’s no such thing as ‘authority’ on Wikipedia. See WP:AEAE. Administrators have special functions that they can perform, and users may edit a certain page more than others, but no ‘authority’ is created (although, perhaps, autoconfirmed users wield more ‘authority’ when random edits occur from new users/IPs) Secondly, there’s no way you can ‘report’ me at the current time. The only function I can think of you considering using is the disruptive editing (WP:DIS and/or WP:AIV) report, but you haven’t warned me three times, so I think not.
 * Threats aren’t allowed on Wikipedia. See WP:ATAEW. Please don’t violate Wikipedia policies. I see your perspective mate, this is a trivial argument. Just follow the precedence of years of Wikipedia editing on other pages. Good day. SpaceFox99 (talk) 05:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Second warning
See my above comment and page history. A primary source must be provided of her retiring in 1988. The souce you have provided and now removed is not suitable, as it doesn't contain inline citations as required in Wikipedia policy. (WP:BLPRS). Stop threatening me with warnings and blocks. (WP:ATAEW). Stop undoing edits or you will trigger the WP:3RR.

The fact that de Havilland's page hasn't been changed in over a decade, considering that it's a lowly-viewed page (see https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2018-01-10&end=2019-01-10&pages=Olivia_de_Havilland), means nothing. If everyone thought that way, nothing would change after a certain amount of time.

I'm sorry to do this, but for the second time, don't disruptively edit wikipedia. If I have to do this four times, or I may have to get WP:AIV involved.SpaceFox99 (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)