User talk:82.7.138.28

Please get familiar with policy on articles to do with living people Please also be aware that any possible conflict of interest however slight should be declared -Snowded TALK 13:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Last warning - if you continue edit warring then you risk being blocked for BLP violation -Snowded TALK 20:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Single purpose anonymous accounts attacking articles about living people are not well regarded on Wikipedia. You need to read the linked policy and you need to use the talk page to make proposals if you are reverted. if you don't do that I will ask for the article to be protected again and for a longer period.

In addition using a tweet stream as a reference for an assertion is called original research and is not permitted. If there is a reliable third party source to continued harassment then we can include it. -Snowded TALK 04:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Your recent editing history at Michael Lissack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Use the talk page -Snowded TALK 12:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Trying again
You can use the talk page of the article to make proposals for changes and I'm happy to help there, but changes must be properly sourced and balanced that that means third party sources. Coming to wikipedia on a mission rarely helps anyone. -Snowded TALK 17:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)